|

 Photo by: Mercy for Animals, Weaver Brothers Egg Farm
in Versailles, Ohio
Megaphone,
please.
"I am battery hen. I
live in a cage so small I cannot stretch my wings. I am forced to stand
night and day on a sloping wire mesh floor that painfully cuts into my
feet. The cage walls tear my feathers, forming blood blisters that never
heal. The air is so full of ammonia that my lungs hurt and my eyes burn
and I think I am going blind. As soon as I was born, a man grabbed me and
sheared off part of my beak with a hot iron, and my little brothers were
thrown into trash bags as useless alive.
My mind is alert and my
body is sensitive and I should have been richly feathered. In nature or
even a farmyard I would have had sociable, cleansing dust baths with my
flock mates, a need so strong that I perform 'vacuum' dust bathing on the
wire floor of my cage. Free, I would have ranged my ancestral jungles and
fields with my mates, devouring plants, earthworms, and insects from
sunrise to dusk. I would have exercised my body and expressed my nature,
and I would have given, and received, pleasure as a whole being. I am only
a year old, but I am already a 'spent hen.'
Humans, I wish I were dead,
and soon I will be dead. Look for pieces of my wounded flesh wherever
chicken pies and soups are sold."
© United Poultry
Concerns. From Karen Davis, PhD, "Thinking Like a Chicken: Farm Animals and the
Feminine Connection," Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical
Explorations, Durham & London: Duke University Press,
1995.
 |
Photo by Laurie Melichar This is Luce, who was rescued by UPC
member Laurie Melichar. Every year in the United States, a
quarter of a billion of these beautiful male chickens are buried
alive or ground up alive by the egg industry as soon as they are
born. These birds represent 250 million more reasons each year to go
- and stay - vegan.


| To find out about all the many issues about Battery Hens,
including how Switzerland got rid of battery hen farming, please go
to links below from United Poultry Concern
To
find out information about KFC - http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/
|
June 22, 2004 http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/pdfs/letter-dalailama.pdf
APPEAL ( by HH Dalai Lama to KFC to abandon plans to
enter Tibet )
On
behalf of my friends at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
(PETA), I am writing
to ask that KFC abandon its plan to open restaurants in Tibet, because your
corporation’s support for cruelty and mass slaughter violate Tibetan
value.
I have
been particularly concerned with the sufferings of chickens for
many years. It was
the death of a chicken that finally strengthened my resolve to become vegetarian. In
1965, I was staying at a Government Guest House in south India. My
room looked directly on to the kitchens opposite. One day I chanced to see the
slaughter of a chicken, which made me decide to become a
vegetarian.
Tibetans are not, as a rule, vegetarians, because in Tibet
vegetables are often
scarce and meat forms a large part of the staple diet. However, it
was considered more
ethical to eat the meat of larger animals such as yaks than small ones, because
fewer large animals would have to be killed. For this reason, consumption of fish
and chicken was rare, in fact traditionally we thought of chickens only as a source of
eggs, not as food
themselves, and even eggs were seldom eaten because they were
thought to dull the
sharpness of mind and memory. Eating chicken only really began with the arrival
of the Chinese communists.
These
days, when I see a row of plucked chickens hanging in a meat
shop it hurts. I find
it unacceptable that violence is the basis of some of our food habits. When I am driving
through the towns near where I live in India I see thousands of chickens in
cages outside restaurants ready to be killed. When I see them I feel very sad, because
in the heat they have
no shade or relief, and in the cold they have no shelter from
the wind. These poor
chickens are treated as if they were merely vegetables.
In
Tibet, buying animals from the butcher, thereby saving their lives,
and setting them free
was a common practice. Many Tibetans, even in exile, continue this practice
where practically possible. It is therefore quite natural for me to support
those who are currently protesting against the introduction of industrial food
practices into Tibet that will perpetuate the suffering of huge numbers of
chickens.
Yours
sincerely,
THE DALAI LAMA
|
Expert Opinions
“In no way can these
living conditions meet the demands of a complex nervous system designed to
form a multitude of memories and make complex decisions.”(1) —Lesley Rogers, Ph.D.,
on battery cages, author of The Development of Brain and Behaviour in
the Chicken
The United Egg Producers tries to
defend its practices as scientifically sound, yet ignores credible,
scientific research that suggests standard industry practices—including
crowding birds into barren cages with no opportunity to nest, roost,
dustbathe, or touch earth; starving birds to induce molt; and mutilating
their beaks without painkiller—cause unnecessary suffering.
Compiled on this page are
relevant quotes from expert scientists and veterinarians, as well as the
Humane Society of the United States.
Dr. Duncan on Battery Cages(2) (UEP
guidelines recommend barren battery cages.)
- “Hens in battery cages are
prevented from performing several natural behaviour patterns. … The
biggest source of frustration is undoubtedly the lack of nesting
opportunity.”(3)
- “The lack of physical space may
actually prevent them from adopting certain postures or performing
particular behaviours.”(4)
- “[T]he difficulty of inspecting
cages means that the welfare of the birds is at some risk.”(5)
- “The lack of space in battery cages
reduces welfare by preventing hens from adopting certain postures—such
as an erect posture with the head raised—and performing particular
behaviors—such as wing-flapping.”(6)
- “Battery cages for laying hens have
been shown (by me and others) to cause extreme frustration particularly
when the hen wants to lay an egg. Battery cages are being phased out in
Europe and other more humane husbandry systems are being
developed.”(7)
Dr. Duncan on “Beak
Trimming” (UEP guidelines recommend “beak trimming” without
painkiller.)
- “There is now good morphological,
neurophysical, and behavioral evidence that beak trimming leads to both
chronic and acute pain.”(8)
- “[Beak trimming] has been shown (by
me and by others) to cause both acute and chronic pain and should not be
allowed to be carried out routinely. It has been banned in some European
countries and they have shown that it is possible to keep hens without
de-beaking them.”(9)
Dr. Duncan on Forced
Molting (UEP guidelines do not prohibit forced molting.)
- “[T]he evidence suggests that hens
suffer enormously during forced molting.”(10)
- “[Forced molting] is a barbaric
practice which doubles mortality in the flock while it is going and
leads to great suffering in all the hens involved.”(11)
Dr. Mench on Battery Cages (UEP
guidelines recommend barren battery cages.)
Note: Dr. Mench sat on the UEP’s
advisory committee for its animal welfare guidelines, which recommend 67
square inches of cage space per bird for white laying hens, an amount of
space Dr. Mench calls “meager”:
- “The recommended space allowance
for laying hens in some countries is 60-80 square inches per hen, barely
enough for the hen to turn around and not enough for her to perform
normal comfort behaviors; however, many hens are allowed less than even
that meager amount.”(12)
- “Battery cages provide an
inadequate environment for nesting, lacking both sites which fit these
criteria [concealment and separation from other birds] as well as
substrates for nest-building. Hens housed in battery cages display
agitated pacing and escape behaviors which last for 2 to 4 hours prior
to oviposition.”(13)
- “A different decision about the
minimum recommendation would have been reached had the committee given
more weight to the information from the preference testing and use of
space studies, since these indicate that hens need and want more space
than 72 square inches.”(14)
Dr. Mench on “Beak
Trimming” (UEP guidelines recommend “beak trimming” without
painkiller.)
- “There is mounting evidence that
beak trimming also results in behavioral and neurophysiological changes
indicative of acute and chronic pain. … Both beak trimmed chicks and
adults display difficulty in grasping and swallowing feed even when
their pecking rates are high.”(15)
Mench: “Chickens explore their
environment with their beaks. They like to pick things up, and that’s
their main way of exploring and touching and feeling things.”
NPR: “So, cutting off the beak is a
big deal, if you’re a hen?”
Mench: “It’s definitely a big
deal.”(16)
Dr. Mench on Forced Molting (UEP
guidelines do not prohibit forced molting.)
- “The bird is starved. Yes, the bird
is starved. I don’t like to see hungry animals not being given
food.”(17)
- “Feed restriction and deprivation
can thus lead to boredom and the development of stereotypies and
vices.”(18)
Dr. Rogers on Battery Cages (UEP
guidelines recommend barren battery cages.)
Referring to battery cages, Dr. Rogers
writes:
- “In no way can these living
conditions meet the demands of a complex nervous system designed to form
a multitude of memories and make complex decisions.”(19)
Dr. Rogers on Chickens
- “With increased knowledge of the
behaviour and cognitive abilities of the chicken, has come the
realization that the chicken is not an inferior species to be treated
merely as a food source.”(20)
Dr. Baxter on Battery Cages (UEP
guidelines recommend barren battery cages.)
- “The space available in a battery
cage does not allow hens even to stand still in the way they would in a
more spacious environment. Some behaviours are completely inhibited by
confinement in a cage causing a progressive accumulation of motivation
to perform the behaviours.”(21)
- “When crowded together this
regulatory system breaks down and the hens appear to be in a chronic
state of social stress, perpetually trying to get away from their
cagemates, not able to express dominance relations by means of spacing
and not even able to resolve social conflict by means of
aggression.”(22)
- “[T]he frustration of nesting
motivation is likely to cause significant suffering to the hen during
the prelaying period every day.”(23)
- “Hens without access to perches may
have more welfare problems resulting from increased aggression, reduced
bone strength, impaired foot condition and higher feather
loss.”(24)
- “The fact that hens are restricted
from exercising to such an extent that they are unable to maintain the
strength of their bones is probably the greatest single indictment of
the battery cage. The increased incidence of bone breakage which results
is a serious welfare insult.”(25)
Dr. Appleby on the UEP Guidelines
- “We believe the egg industry still
has a long way to go before they can claim to be treating animals
humanely. … The proposal put forth recognizes that animal welfare is a
consideration, but it fails to address the worst abuses that are
standard practice in the egg industry.”(26)
Dr. Dunayer on the UEP Guidelines
- “In the end, the UEP’s guidelines
do little more than codify already present industry practices. The
proposed increase in space allotted to each chicken is both
insignificant and falls well short of the area a chicken needs to carry
out her normal behaviors.”(30)
Click here to
read Dr. Dunayer’s full statement on the UEP guidelines.
Dr. Patterson on the UEP Guidelines
- “The UEP’s attempt to address
welfare concerns in laying flocks and to standardize husbandry practices
is meager at best. Even though some useful recommendations are made, in
most cases they are so vague and riddled with loopholes, that
practically any egg producer could be “Animal Care Certified.” My
biggest concern is how this certification program will mislead consumers
into believing that they are buying eggs from producers that treat hens
humanely.”(31)
Click here to read Dr. Patterson’s full statement on the UEP
guidelines.
- “The United Egg Producers is not
tackling the systematic abuses within the industry that severely
compromise the welfare of individual birds. … [The UEP guidelines] seem
designed more to mollify consumers than to address the extreme animal
welfare abuses that have become the norm in this industry.”(32)
References
- Lesley J.
Rogers. The Development of Brain and Behaviour in the Chicken.
(Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International, 1995, p. 218).
- Dr. Duncan
also has some positive comments on the welfare of hens in battery cages,
mainly that they are more hygienic than production systems which group
thousands of birds together on a floor, as is practiced by many
so-called “cage-free” egg facilities. As well, hens seem to prefer to
live in smaller groups of birds than in much larger ones containing
thousands of birds, as is the practice of many “cage-free” but not
necessarily truly free-range commercial egg facilities.
- Ian J. Duncan.
“The Pros and Cons of Cages,” World’s Poultry Science Journal
2001: 57, p. 385.
- Ibid.
- Ibid., p. 383.
- Ian J. Duncan.
“Thirty Years of Progress in Animal Welfare Science,” Journal of
Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1998: 1, pp. 151-154.
- Ian J. Duncan.
Letter dated June 25, 2003, to Dr. Nancy Halpern, New Jersey Department
of Agriculture.
- Ian J. Duncan.
“The Science of Animal Well-Being.” A report from a speech in the
Animal Welfare Information Center Newsletter, National
Agriculture Library, 1993 (Jan.–March): 4.1, p. 5. As cited in Karen
Davis’ Prisoned Chickens, Poisoned Eggs (Book Publishing Company,
1996, p. 68).
- Ian J. Duncan.
Letter dated June 25, 2003, to Dr. Nancy Halpern, New Jersey Department
of Agriculture.
- Ian J.
Duncan. “Thirty Years of Progress in Animal Welfare Science,” Journal
of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1998: 1, pp. 151-154.
- Ian J.
Duncan. Letter dated June 25, 2003, to Dr. Nancy Halpern, New Jersey
Department of Agriculture.
- David Fraser,
Joy Mench, Suzanne Millman. “Farm Animals and Their Welfare in 2000,”
State of the Animals 2001, Humane Society Press, 2001, p. 93-94.
- Joy A. Mench.
“The Welfare of Poultry in Modern Production Systems,” Poultry
Science Reviews 4: p. 112.
- Joy Mench,
Janice Swanson. “Developing Science-Based Animal Welfare Guidelines.” A
speech delivered at the 2000 Poultry Symposium and Egg Processing
Workshop. http://animalscience.ucdavis.edu/Avian/pubs.htm.
- Joy A. Mench.
“The Welfare of Poultry in Modern Production Systems,” Poultry
Science Reviews 4: p. 117.
- “McDonald’s
& Farming,” National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” program
aired on April 15, 2002. http://discover.npr.org/features/feature.jhtml?wfId=1141753.
- Ibid.
- Joy A. Mench.
“The Welfare of Poultry in Modern Production Systems,” Poultry
Science Reviews 4: p. 112.
- Lesley J.
Rogers. The Development of Brain and Behaviour in the Chicken.
(Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International, 1995, p. 218).
- Ibid., p.
213.
- Michael R.
Baxter. “The Welfare Problems of Laying Hens in Battery Cages,” The
Veterinary Record 1994: 134, p. 617.
- Ibid., p.
618.
- Ibid., p.
618.
- Ibid., p.
615.
- Ibid., p.
618.
- HSUS press
release entitled, “HSUS Says Egg Industry Guidelines Don't Go Far
Enough,” June 27, 2002. http://www.hsus.org/ace/14515.
- Todd Hartman,
"A fix in the henhouse," Rocky Mountain News, Oct. 16, 2002.
- Temple
Grandin, Ph.D. “Corporations Can Be Agents of Great Improvements in
Animal Welfare and Food Safety and the Need for Minimum Decent
Standards.” A paper presented at the National Institute of Animal
Agriculture on April 4, 2001. http://www.grandin.com/welfare/corporation.agents.html.
- Mary
MacArthur. “Analyst Says Poultry Growers Oblivious to Poor Conditions,”
Western Producer, Dec. 12, 2002.
- Eric Dunayer,
DVM. Letter dated May 8, 2003, regarding new UEP guidelines. Click here for the full letter.
- Christopher
Patterson, DVM. Letter dated June 8, 2003, regarding new UEP guidelines.
Click here for
the full letter.
- HSUS press
release entitled, “HSUS Says Egg Industry Guidelines Don't Go Far
Enough,” June 27, 2002. http://www.hsus.org/ace/14515.
Watch PETA Video
http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/getvideo.asp?video=australia_chicken
KFC Abandons
Plans to Enter Tibet after appeals from HH Dalai
Lama*
http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/dalailama.asp?c=114
After receiving an appeal from His Holiness the
14th Dalai Lama Tenzin Gyatso, KFC has abandoned plans to open its
first restaurant in Tibet. The victory comes after international media
coverage of His Holiness' appeal, including this story from the
BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3836927.stm
His Holiness is the head of the Tibetan
government-in-exile and spiritual leader to the more than 350 million
Buddhists worldwide. The Dalai Lama, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize
in 1989, has long been known to speak out on social justice issues
ranging from China's occupation of Tibet to the problems associated
with globalization. Now, His Holiness has lent his voice to the 750
million chickens raised and killed for KFC each year by writing a
powerful appeal to KFC, asking the company to cancel its plans to
expand its growing Chinese operation into his homeland of
Tibet.
http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs.asp?video=dalai_lama_kfc View PETA video
In his
appeal, His Holiness writes, "On behalf of my friends at People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), I am writing to ask that KFC
abandon its plan to open restaurants in Tibet, because your
corporation's support for cruelty and mass slaughter violate Tibetan
values . I have been particularly concerned with the sufferings of
chickens for many years. It was the death of a chicken that finally
strengthened my resolve to become vegetarian. . These days, when I see
a row of plucked chickens hanging in a meat shop it hurts. I find it
unacceptable that violence is the basis of some of our food habits. .
It is therefore quite natural for me to support those who are
currently protesting against the introduction of industrial food
practices into Tibet that will perpetuate the suffering of huge
numbers of chickens." Click here
http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com/pdfs/letter-dalailama.pdf to read the entire
letter.
The Dalai Lama wants KFC to stop slicing the beaks off baby
birds without pain relief, stop breeding and drugging birds to grow so
obese that their legs break and stop scalding millions of chickens
to death in slaughterhouses every year.
Do Chickens Suffer in Wire Cages?
Hens in Cage
Published
in the Rochester (NY) Democrat and Chronicle, on August 19, 2005 under
the title, "Keep chickens out of wire-floored cages," the following
op-ed, by UPC President Karen Davis, is a response to "Chicken-cruelty
charge and video rebuffed by execs, others" by Corydon Ireland,
07/02/05. The article, which discusses "A vegetarian activist group
[that] broke into the Wegmans Egg Farm in Wayne County [NY] three times
last summer and is now using video footage from the illegal nighttime
visits to level charges of animal cruelty against Rochester-based
Wegmans Food Markets Inc.," contains industry opinions presented as
"science" regarding the welfare of hens in battery cages. The
heartrending video, Wegmans Cruelty, can be viewed
at WegmanCruelty.com, or you can order the DVD from UPC for
$10 (includes shipping).
Keep
chickens out of wire-floored cages By Karen Davis, PhD,
President of United Poultry Concerns Rochester Democrat and Chronicle,
08/19/05
Egg industry people often claim that hens don't mind
living and laying their eggs in wire cages, but this claim has more to
do with assuaging the public than setting the record straight. In
reality, ample science shows why chickens do not do "perfectly well" in
cages.
Chickens' feet and legs contain complex joints including
many small bones, ligaments, cartilage pads, tendons and muscles that
enable them to search and scratch for food on land. Wild chickens (the
Red Jungle Fowl of Southeast Asia, from which all chickens derive) and
feral chickens (domesticated chickens that revert to living free) spend
half to 90 percent of their time foraging, making up to 15,000 pecks a
day. But it isn't just wild and feral chickens. As biologist Marian
Stamp Dawkins writes in her book Through Our Eyes Only?: "An
ancestral memory of this way of life seems to have carried down the
generations into the cages of our modern intensive farms so that even
highly domesticated breeds have the same drive to scratch away to get
their food."
Based on experiments, Dawkins explains that if hens
kept all their lives on wire floors are suddenly given access to a
floor of wood-shavings or peat, they have "an immediate and strong
preference for these more natural floors over the wire ones, which is
all they have known until then. They dustbathe, eat particles of peat
and scratch with their feet. It is not just the extra comfort afforded
by a soft floor that attracts them, but all the behavior they can
do there as well."
By contrast, when hens are forced to stand
and sit on wire mesh, their feet can become sore, cracked and deformed.
The hen's claws, which are designed to scratch vigorously, and thus
stay short and blunt, become long, thin, twisted and broken. They can
curl around the wire floor and entrap the hen, causing her to starve to
death inches from her food and water.
The overriding
issue is that hens are birds with behavior patterns that have no outlet
in a cage. And it isn't just animal advocates who point this
out.
Concerning battery cages for hens, Dr. Lesley Rogers writes in
her book, The Development of Brain and Behaviour in the Chicken: "In
no way can these living conditions meet the demands of a complex
nervous system designed to form a multitude of memories and to make
complex decisions."
Chickens need to be cage-free.
|